| Sun 3 Jan 2010 13:45 Yanina From: USA New York | |
"Semantics: The first observation is that the dictionary confirms the old adage: Scratch a Russian, and underneath is a Tatar (i.e. a Tьrk). The scope of "Tьrkisms" in Russian is a language in itself; with a 1,412-word root vocabulary you can write a book, a poem, or an article on any subject in the Middle Age life. Moreover, without the Tьrkic words, no book, poem, or an article can be written in Russian on any subject."
"Moreover, without the Tьrkic words, no book, poem, or an article can be written in Russian on any subject" yea, you wish your 1ooo something words were so important. of course you CAN write anything without using Turkic words. This was just so stupid to say. Every Turkic word like "obezyana" for instance has a synonim which will be not a Turkic word, for instance "primat." etc, think for your selg. I just could not stop laughing when i read your claim. Don't be stupid, remove it from you site. | |
Dear Yanina, thank you for a nice citation. What we see here is, first, a thick layer of Bulgarian, Kipchak, Oguz, etc. admixture that was a base for the Rus language and culture, officially attributed in the last 300 years to the petty survivors of the 4,000 Mongolo-Tatars in Batu's disposal. Is not that a deliberately fake history? Secondly, the brave people like Shipova must be a pride of the country, she must be admired and remembered, and serve as a model of a real scientist of the country. Thirdly, you can remove "Obez'yana" and "Vorota" and "telega" and "Soyuz" form the language, but what are you going to do with that stupid Pushkin? Unfortunately, he used all these kind of words of his language. You revise Pushkin, Derjavin, Chernyshevsky, Turgenev, Tolstoy, Khruschev, Brejnev, Eltsyn, Putin, Medvedev, and we will return to the subject. Next time, try to write a sentense without those Turkic words you were using in Russian reverse translation. Thanks, Norm |
|